docs(website): Comparison with Rspress (#10822)

Co-authored-by: Sébastien Lorber <slorber@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
João Victor Lopes 2025-01-07 08:11:51 -03:00 committed by GitHub
parent 5a50522905
commit fcc9e5c56a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194

View file

@ -180,6 +180,12 @@ Currently, GitBook is only free for open-source and non-profit teams. Docusaurus
In comparison with statically generated HTML and interactivity added using `<script />` tags, Docusaurus sites are React apps. Using modern JavaScript ecosystem tooling, we hope to set new standards on doc sites' performance, asset building pipeline and optimizations, and ease to set up.
### Rspress {#rspress}
[Rspress](https://rspress.dev/) is a fast static site generator based on Rspack, a Rust-based bundler. It supports content writing with MDX (Markdown with React components), integrated text search, multilingual support (i18n), and extensibility through plugins. Designed for creating elegant documentation and static websites, Rspress produces static HTML files that are easy to deploy.
Rspress and Docusaurus are quite similar. They both have their pros and cons. Rspress was created more recently and benefits from a modern infrastructure that enables faster site builds. Docusaurus stands out for its maturity, comprehensive feature set, flexibility, and strong community. It is also [modernizing its infrastructure](https://github.com/facebook/docusaurus/issues/10556) regularly to remain competitive in terms of performance.
## Staying informed {#staying-informed}
- [GitHub](https://github.com/facebook/docusaurus)